Home  ›  Did Democrats Read the Affordable Care Act

Did Democrats Read the Affordable Care Act

Written By Tuesday 8 March 2022 Add Comment Edit

Healthcare Policy Logo.png

Healthcare policy in the U.S.
Obamacare overview
Obamacare lawsuits
Medicare and Medicaid
Healthcare statistics
Public Policy Logo-one line.png

Obamacare glossary • Effect of Obamacare • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

The Patient Protection and Affordable Intendance Act, also known every bit the Affordable Care Human activity (ACA) or Obamacare, was passed on March 21, 2010, and signed into constabulary by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. The law required most individuals to obtain health insurance and required almost employers to offer it. Information technology provided revenue enhancement credits and cost-sharing subsidies for individuals to purchase insurance in the individual market and provided for an expansion of Medicaid to cover childless adults earning incomes upwardly to 138 per centum of the poverty level. Insurers were prohibited from denying coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions, were required to offer a standard set of benefits, and were limited in the means they could vary their premiums.[1]

HIGHLIGHTS

  • The Affordable Care Deed passed the Senate 60-39 forth party lines on Dec 24, 2009, and passed the House 219-212 on March 21, 2010. 30-four House Democrats voted in opposition.

  • As of November 2018, a total of 36 states and Washington, D.C., had expanded or voted to expand Medicaid, while 14 states had not. The map beneath provides information on Medicaid expansions past state; for states that expanded, hover over the state to view the political affiliation of the governor at the fourth dimension of expansion.[two]

  • President Donald Trump's primary healthcare policy initiative has been working to fulfill his campaign promise to repeal and replace the ACA. He expressed support for the House and Senate bills that proposed modifying parts of the ACA, but as of Nov 2018, Congress had not passed a bill.

    • This folio provides a summary of the Affordable Care Human activity equally it was written and provides information on legislation attempting to change or repeal the constabulary, as well as on lawsuits related to the constabulary. Encounter the department summaries below for a brief description of the information contained in each section. Click on the section titles to be taken to that function of the article.

    1. Congressional passage: This section outlines the votes taken on the bill in the U.S. Firm and U.Due south. Senate, as well every bit a list of Democratic senators who voted confronting the ACA.
    2. Implementation timeline: This section provides a timeline of implementation dates for major provisions of the ACA as they were written in the law.
    3. Summary of the law: This section provides a summary of the major components of the ACA, including the requirement to obtain insurance, the ways the law facilitated greater insurance coverage, and the requirements the constabulary placed on health plans and insurers.
    4. Attempts to alter or repeal: This department provides an overview of legislation and lawsuits undertaken in attempts to change or repeal parts of the police.

    For more than information on the affect of the ACA in each state, click here.

    Congressional passage

    Federalism
    Federalism VNT image.png
    Click hither for more coverage of federalism on Ballotpedia

    In July 2009, House Democrats introduced the Affordable Health Care for America Act, the precursor to the Affordable Care Act. The House passed the pecker on November 7, 2009, with the votes of 219 Democrats and one Republican (Rep. Joseph Cao (R-La.)). Xxx-nine Democrats and 176 Republicans voted confronting the bill. On Dec 24, 2009, the Senate passed its version of the beak 60-39, with all Democrats voting in favor of the bill and all Republicans just one voting against information technology (Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) was not nowadays for the vote).[3]

    In January 2010, Republican Scott Brown of Massachusetts won a special election to fill the seat of Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), who had died in August 2009. Unless the Business firm agreed to the Senate'south version of the bill, a committee of members from the House and Senate would have to resolve differences betwixt the 2 bills with a new pecker that would demand to receive another vote in the Senate—with the election of Brown, Senate Democrats would not have 60 votes to overcome a Republican delay on the new bill. A bulk of the House Democratic Conclave agreed to laissez passer the Senate nib as long as subsequent upkeep-related changes to the bill could exist made via the reconciliation procedure—reconciliation bills just demand fifty Senate votes to pass and are non discipline to filibuster. The House passed the Senate bill on March 21, 2010, with 178 House Republicans opposing the bill's passage along with 34 Democrats, while 219 Democrats voted in favor, leaving the final vote at 219-212. The House passed the reconciliation package on the same 24-hour interval past a vote of 220-211 and the Senate approved the bill on March 25, 2010, past a vote of 56-43.[3] [4]

    President Obama signed the Senate neb on March 23, 2010, and the reconciliation neb on March xxx, 2010. The two bills together are referred to as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Affordable Care Human activity, or Obamacare.[iii]

    Democrats in opposition

    The following is a list of U.Southward. Firm Democrats who voted against the ACA's passage during the March 21, 2010 vote:[five]

    • Bobby Bright (D-AL)
    • Artur Davis (D-AL) -Co-Sponsor
    • Robert Drupe (D-AR)
    • Mike Ross (D-AR)
    • Jim Marshall (D-GA)
    • John Barrow (D-GA)
    • Walter Minnick (D-ID) -Co-Sponsor
    • Daniel Lipinski (D-IL)
    • Ben Chandler (D-KY)
    • Charlie Melancon (D-LA)
    • Frank Kratovil (D-MD)
    • Stephen Lynch (D-MA)
    • Collin Peterson (D-MN)
    • Travis Childers (D-MS)
    • Factor Taylor (D-MS)
    • Ike Skelton (D-MO) -Co-Sponsor
    • John Adler (D-NJ)
    • Harry Teague (D-NM)
    • Michael E. McMahon (D-NY)
    • Michael Arcuri (D-NY)
    • Mike McIntyre (D-NC)
    • Larry Kissell (D-NC)
    • Heath Shuler (D-NC)
    • Zack Infinite (D-OH)
    • Dan Boren (D-OK)
    • Jason Altmire (D-PA)
    • Tim Holden (D-PA)
    • Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-SD)
    • Lincoln Davis (D-TN)
    • John Tanner (D-TN)
    • Chet Edwards (D-TX)
    • Jim Matheson (D-UT)
    • Glenn Nye (D-VA)
    • Rick Boucher (D-VA)

    Implementation timeline

    See as well: Implementation of the Affordable Care Human action

    President Obama signs the Affordable Care Act.

    The following is a timeline of the implementation dates of key aspects of the Affordable Intendance Act. Some of the dates were after changed or delayed; these changes are not reflected in this timeline.[vi]

    2010

    • January ane: The federal regime begins providing tax credits for small-scale businesses offering health insurance to employees.
    • July 1: The Temporary Pre-existing Status Insurance Programme is established, offered by either the federal authorities or private country governments. The program provides coverage for individuals with pre-existing conditions until 2014.
    • July one: Deadline for HealthCare.gov to be established equally a minimally functioning website to educate consumers on coverage options.
    • July 1: The federal government begins collecting a 10 percent excise tax on indoor tanning services
    • September 23: The requirement for insurers to let adult children to remain on a parent's wellness insurance plan until age 26 begins
    • September 23: Insurance plans are prohibited from setting lifetime coverage limitations.
    • September 23: The requirement for insurers to allow appeals with an external review process begins.
    • September 23: New plans established after this appointment are required to cover a standard set of health benefits (the 10 essential wellness benefits).

    2011

    • January one: The requirement for insurers to provide rebate each year if a minimum proportion of premiums was not spent on medical services begins.
    • January 1: Health savings accounts may no longer be used for certain purposes.
    • March 23: The starting time round of grants are provided to states for the establishment of health insurance exchanges.

    2012

    • September 23: The requirement for all insurers to provide a uniform summary of care and benefits to consumers begins.

    2013

    • January i: Deadline for states to notify the U.South. Department of Health and Man Services whether they will form their own exchanges or join the federal exchange.
    • July 1: Borderline for grants and loans to exist awarded to starting time-up co-ops, nonprofit, fellow member-run health insurance companies designed by the ACA.

    2014

    • Jan 1: States begin to be immune to aggrandize Medicaid coverage to childless adults under 65 earning incomes up to 138 pct of the federal poverty level.
    • January ane: Deadline for individuals to obtain wellness insurance to avert paying a tax penalty.
    • January 1: Insurance companies no longer immune to place annual limits on the amount they pay out for benefits.
    • March 31: Months spend without health insurance begin to exist counted toward the tax penalty.

    2015

    • January 1: Employers with more than 100 employees assessed fees, per employee, for not providing health insurance options

    2016

    • January 1: Employers with fifty-99 employees assessed fees, per employee, for non providing health insurance options

    Summary of the law

    Co-ordinate to HealthCare.gov, the official website for the Affordable Intendance Deed, the police had three main goals:

    "
    • Make affordable wellness insurance available to more people. The police force provides consumers with subsidies ("premium revenue enhancement credits") that lower costs for households with incomes between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level.
    • Aggrandize the Medicaid program to cover all adults with income below 138% of the federal poverty level. (Non all states have expanded their Medicaid programs.)
    • Support innovative medical intendance delivery methods designed to lower the costs of health care generally.[7]
    		"
    —HealthCare.gov[eight]

    This section provides a summary of the major components of the ACA:

    • the requirement for individuals to obtain wellness coverage and employers to offer it
    • the constabulary's facilitation of greater health insurance coverage through co-ops and wellness insurance exchanges
    • the requirements the law placed on health plans and insurers
    • the Medicaid expansion
    • changes to Medicare reimbursements and coverage
    • taxes and fees

    Health coverage requirements

    Individual mandate

    The police required every individual to obtain health insurance and established fines for those who did not. The fines were designed to exist based on the number of months a person went without wellness insurance in a given year and to increase each yr from 2014 to 2016. The fine schedule was written every bit follows:[3] [nine]

    • 2014: maximum of $95 or i per centum of income, whichever is greater
    • 2015: maximum of $325 or two pct of income, whichever is greater
    • 2016 and thereafter: maximum of $695 or 2.v percent of income, whichever is greater

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was given responsibleness for collecting the fine, assessed annually equally a taxation penalty during the income tax filing period. The law established a hardship exemption from the fine for individuals who meet sure qualifications—such equally being homeless, existence a victim of domestic violence, or filing for bankruptcy.[10]

    Employer mandate

    Under the law, medium-sized and large employers could incur fines for non offering affordable wellness coverage or not offering coverage at all. The law divers affordable as costing employees less than 9.69 percent of their gross household income in premiums. The police established requirements for employers with at least 50 employees to offer affordable coverage that covers at least 60 percent of costs to at to the lowest degree 95 percentage of their workforce. If an employer does not encounter these conditions and has at least one employee claim a taxation credit to purchase coverage on the exchange, a fine would be incurred. The fine for non offering coverage at all was gear up at $two,000 per employee. The fine for non offering affordable coverage was set at $3,000 per employee. These fines were indexed to ascent with aggrandizement and in 2017 amounted to $2,260 and $3,390, respectively.[eleven] [12]

    Purchasing health insurance

    Wellness insurance exchanges

    See also: Healthcare.gov website rollout and health insurance exchange issues
    Overview

    The Affordable Care Deed provided for the creation of wellness insurance exchanges, sometimes referred to as marketplaces, to act as a hub for consumers to browse and purchase wellness plans. The exchanges were designed to exist attainable via websites, call centers, or in person. The law gave states three options regarding the exchanges:[13] [14]

    1. Establish and manage their ain land exchange (land-based exchange)
    2. Enter into a partnership with the federal regime to jointly manage an exchange (state-federal partnership commutation)
    3. Cede responsibility for establishing and managing an exchange to the federal government (federally facilitated exchange)

    The law also immune states to gear up more than than one substitution to serve residents in different areas within their borders, and multiple states could create a regional exchange. However, as of August 2017, no state had chosen those options. The majority of states, 28 of them, had federally facilitated marketplaces. Some other 17 had state-based exchanges; five of these exchanges were land run while utilizing the federal platform, Healthcare.gov. Vi states partnered with the federal government to run their exchanges.[13] [fifteen]

    States were given grants from the federal government to support the establishment and early administration of their exchanges. A total of $5 billion was awarded in grants. The grants concluded on January 1, 2015, after which any land-based exchanges were expected to exist self-sustaining.[16]

    Plans offered

    The constabulary outlined four tiers of health coverage to be sold on the exchanges:

    • statuary (lowest premiums, covers 60 per centum of costs),
    • silver (covers 70 per centum of costs),
    • gold (covers fourscore percent of costs), and
    • platinum (highest premiums, covers ninety percent of costs).

    Plans were required to be designed and labeled nether one of these four tiers to be sold on the exchanges. Just like other health plans, the portion of costs not covered by the health plan would autumn to consumers.[17]

    Fiscal assistance

    The police created avant-garde premium revenue enhancement credits—payments from the federal government to aid cover the toll of premiums for those buying from the exchanges—for individuals earning incomes between 100 percent and 400 pct of the federal poverty level (FPL). In states that expanded Medicaid to adults with incomes up to 138 percent of the poverty level, eligibility for tax credits was set to begin at 139 per centum of the poverty level; individuals were not allowed to be eligible for both Medicaid and health insurance subsidies. It limited the percentage of income these individuals could be required to pay towards their premiums and calculated credit amounts based on the departure betwixt this percentage and the total premium toll for a benchmark programme. The percentage of income households must pay was indexed to alter each year based on premium growth as compared to income growth. Consumers were given the choice to have their revenue enhancement credits be paid directly to insurance companies on a monthly ground or merits the total credit on an annual basis when filing taxes.

    The ACA likewise established a reduction in toll-sharing responsibilities for individuals earning incomes between 100 percent and 250 percent of the FPL, meaning they could enroll in silver plans that cover up to 94 percent of their costs. The law restricted eligibility for taxation credits and cost-sharing reductions to individuals who buy a health program through an exchange.[18] [19] [20] [21]

    For 2017, the U.Southward. Section of Wellness and Human being Services used 2016 poverty guidelines to determine tax credit and cost-sharing eligibility:[19] [22] [23]

    • The federal poverty level amounted to $eleven,880 for individuals and $24,300 for families of four.
    • For individuals, 138 percentage of the FPL amounted to $16,394, while 400 pct amounted to $47,520.
    • For a family of iv, 138 percent of the FPL amounted to $33,534, while 400 percent amounted to $97,200.
    • Incomes that were 250 per centum of the FPL amounted to $29,700 for individuals and $lx,750 for a family unit of four.

    The police did not make tax credits available for individuals below the poverty level. Childless adults who (1) reside in a state that did not expand Medicaid and (2) earn incomes between their country's Medicaid eligibility threshold and the poverty level could still buy insurance on the exchanges, but would not receive taxation credits. Click 'show' on the tables beneath to view consummate data on 2016 incomes and the 2017 maximum monthly premium paid for a criterion program by poverty level pct, upwardly to a family of four.[24]

    Co-ops

    The Affordable Care Act designed a program for the creation of nonprofit health insurance companies called Consumer Operated and Oriented Plans, or co-ops for short. The law provided federal loans for the get-go-upward of co-op insurance companies and outlined a series of regulations for their functioning. The controlling board of a co-op was to include members enrolled in wellness plans through the company in order to act equally a vocalisation for enrollees. The police force also stipulated that no representative from an insurance company or association could serve on the co-op boards.[25]

    Co-ops could sell individual and small group insurance plans on or off the health insurance exchanges (described below). The co-ops were non allowed to accept investment income and could only sell one-third of their plans in the large group employer market. Whatsoever profits would exist reinvested back into the company. Out of 23 co-ops that were created under the constabulary, iv remained in functioning as of August 2017.[25]

    Requirements for health plans and insurers

    Run across also: Health insurance policy cancellations since Obamacare

    Coverage

    The Affordable Intendance Human activity prohibited private market insurers from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions. This policy is known every bit guaranteed issue. Guaranteed issue regulations had already existed for insurers selling employer-sponsored wellness plans, and the ACA extended this rule to the individual market place as well.[26]

    The law also required insurers to allow immature adults to stay on their parents' health insurance plans until age 26. Insurers were as well required to allow people in the private market place to renew their health plans each year unless they did not pay their premiums.[26]

    Benefits

    The ACA required individual and pocket-size group wellness plans that were offered both on and off the exchanges to cover services that fall into x wide benefits categories, called essential health benefits:[27]

    • Ambulatory patient services
    • Emergency services
    • Hospitalization
    • Maternity and newborn care
    • Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
    • Prescription drugs
    • Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral wellness treatment
    • Laboratory services
    • Preventive and health services and chronic illness management
    • Pediatric services, including oral and vision care

    The exact services covered were selected by each state according to the needs of its citizens; the simply requirement was that covered benefits fall into each of the 10 broad categories listed to a higher place. All health plans were required to comprehend 100 percent of the toll of preventive services, such equally screenings, equally long every bit the md providing the service was in the insurance plan's network. All health plans were also required to embrace contraception and services related to breastfeeding.[27] [28] [29]

    Premiums

    The ACA placed restrictions on the manner private and small-scale group insurers set up a plan's premium:

    • Premiums were not allowed to vary due to an individual'south health status or a pre-existing condition.
    • Premiums were not allowed to vary due to characteristics such every bit gender.
    • Premiums for older individuals were not immune to be more than 3 times higher than those for younger individuals.
    • Premiums for tobacco users were not allowed to be more than 1.5 times college than for non-tobacco users.

    The law did not place limits on premium variation due to geographic location or the number of individuals covered past a plan. The law prohibited annual and lifetime limits on the corporeality insurers volition pay out for covered benefits. Additionally, if individuals miss premium payments, insurers were required to allow that person to retain coverage for three months, although insurers merely had to pay doctors for one month. If the premium amount was not paid during that time, then coverage could exist terminated.[26] [28] [thirty] [31] [32]

    The law established a program for reviewing insurance premium charge per unit increases. If a state decided to administer its own program, information technology was required to meet minimum standards outlined by the U.South. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). HHS was given the authorisation to review state programs, and if they did not meet the standards, federal regulators could take over the charge per unit review process for that state. States could also cede rate review responsibleness to HHS. Insurers were required to submit proposed rate increases of 10 per centum or more than to either state or federal regulators, whichever was applicable, for review, along with data supporting the increase. The secretary of health and homo services was not granted the dominance to reject premium increases; however, many state laws permit country regulators to turn down or amend premium requests.[33]

    Medical loss ratio

    A medical loss ratio (MLR) is the portion of premium acquirement that insurers spend on claims, medical care and healthcare quality for their customers. The remaining revenue typically goes toward overhead costs, such equally administration, marketing and employee salaries, and so to turn a profit. The Affordable Care Human action (ACA) placed new regulations on insurers' medical loss ratios by limiting the portion of revenue that goes toward overhead and profit: individual and small group insurers were required to maintain a minimum medical loss ratio of 80 percent, while large group insurers were required to maintain a minimum MLR of 85 percent. This means at least fourscore or 85 percent of premium revenue were required exist used to pay customer claims and support improvements in health and healthcare quality, such equally wellness promotion programs.[34] [35] [36]

    Each year, insurers were required to publicly report their medical loss ratio and other financial information for each country and marketplace segment. If their MLR falls below 80 per centum or 85 percent, they would be required to notify their customers and provide a rebate the following year. The law exempted insurers serving fewer than 1,000 individuals in a state.[34] [36]

    Stabilization programs

    The Affordable Intendance Act outlined three federal programs that were meant to stabilize the individual market during the start few years of the law and prevent premiums from rise too rapidly every bit insurers adapted to the new regulations:[37]

    • Permanent risk aligning required all individual and small group insurers with relatively lower risk to make payments to individual and small-scale group insurers with relatively higher run a risk. The program was meant to stabilize the market past spreading financial gamble. The police did not give this program an expiration date.
    • Temporary chance corridors limited the losses and profits of insurers in the reformed individual marketplace by requiring insurers with lower-than-expected costs to make payments to the federal government. Insurers with college-than-expected costs received payments. The program was meant to protect insurers that set inaccurate premiums for the initial years of the exchanges and simply applied to insurers selling plans on the exchanges. This program was gear up to expire in 2017. On June 14, 2018, a federal appellate court ruled that the federal authorities did not have to make payments to insurers under the take chances corridor program. The adapt was brought by ii health insurers, Moda Wellness and State of Lincoln. The court ruled 2 to one that the federal government did not accept to make gamble corridor payments because Congress took action after the enactment of Obamacare to ensure that the program remained budget neutral from yr to year.[38]
    • Transitional reinsurance required most health insurers (private, small group, and large group) to pay a fee to the federal government based on their enrollment figures for a plan year. The fee went toward payments to insurers on the individual market that covered high-cost individuals. The program was meant to keep premiums low by offsetting the price of care for individuals with complex atmospheric condition. This program was set to expire in 2016.

    Medicaid

    Come across also: Medicaid spending by state

    Eligibility expansion

    The Affordable Intendance Act expanded eligibility for Medicaid to more than individuals. Medicaid was originally limited to meaning women and young children with household incomes effectually the federal poverty level, and to disabled people, older children, and parents with household incomes below the federal poverty level. Each state was allowed to decide whether to also cover able-bodied adults without children or people with slightly college incomes, though they were previously required to obtain a federal waiver to do this.[39]

    The ACA provided for the expansion of Medicaid eligibility to comprehend childless adults whose income amounted to 138 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) or below. In 2017, this amounted to $xvi,643 for individuals and $33,948 for a family of 4. Although the law originally required states to expand their Medicaid programs or lose federal Medicaid funding, in 2012, the U.Due south. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could not condition Medicaid funding on an expansion of the programme. The ruling essentially made participation in the expansion voluntary on the role of united states.[3] [xl]

    The provision for expanding Medicaid went into issue nationwide in 2014. The federal regime provided 100 percent of funding to cover newly eligible enrollees through 2016, dropping this funding level to 95 per centum in 2017 and to 90 percent in 2020 and thereafter. The law did not provide for tax credits for adults with household incomes lower than the federal poverty level, considering the law had intended to cover these people nether Medicaid. In states that didn't aggrandize Medicaid, these adults neither qualified for Medicaid nor for federal tax credits to purchase health insurance.[41] [42]

    Equally of January 2022, a total of 38 states and Washington, D.C., had expanded or voted to expand Medicaid, while 12 states had not. The map below provides information on Medicaid expansions past land; for states that expanded, hover over the state to view the political amalgamation of the governor at the time of expansion.[43]

    Other provisions

    The Affordable Intendance Human activity enacted a temporary increase for Medicaid's reimbursements to primary care physicians, matching Medicare levels during 2013 and 2014. The law provided states with federal funding for the purpose. States were not required to maintain the higher reimbursement rates afterward 2014. The law also established the requirement that states accept multiple forms of enrollment applications, including online applications.[3]

    Medicare

    Spending and revenues

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) included changes to Medicare reimbursements and the premiums that beneficiaries pay. The law reduced reimbursements to private Medicare Reward plans, which are health plans for Medicare beneficiaries administered by private insurers and financed by the federal authorities. The alter was expected to reduce Medicare spending by $132 billion between 2010 and 2020. The police force also reduced payments to healthcare providers.[44] [45]

    In improver, prior to the ACA, Medicare required beneficiaries at a certain level of income to pay higher monthly premiums for coverage. The income threshold was indexed to increase annually with inflation. The ACA suspended this indexing through 2019, meaning over time, more beneficiaries would be required to pay the college premiums. The ACA likewise required college-income beneficiaries to brainstorm paying higher premiums for prescription drug coverage.[45]

    Contained Payment Advisory Board

    The law established a new government bureau called the Independent Payment Informational Board (IPAB). IBAP was modeled on a proposal by erstwhile senator Tom Daschle, who in plough modeled it after the Federal Reserve Board. If the projected rate of growth in Medicare spending exceeded a target amount, IPAB would exist required to craft a proposal to reduce Medicare spending. IPAB's decisions would exist binding and would crave a iii-fifths super-majority from Congress in order to exist overturned. The Department of Health and Human Services would automatically implement its recommendations unless overridden past Congress. However, the law stipulated that IPAB could not ration healthcare, enhance premiums or restrict eligibility.[46]

    Writing in the Wall Street Periodical, Sarah Palin argued that the Affordable Care Deed "implicitly endorses the use of 'decease panel'-like rationing past way of the new Independent Payments Advisory Board—making bureaucrats, not medical professionals, the ultimate arbiters of what types of treatment will (and particularly volition non) be reimbursed nether Medicare." Every bit of 2017, the IPAB had not been created.[47] [48]

    Medicare prescription drug coverage

    The police force closed the doughnut hole of Medicare prescription drug coverage (Office D). Previously, Medicare would comprehend prescription drug costs upwardly to $two,250 in a given year, after which beneficiaries were responsible for 100 percent of their prescription drug costs until they striking $5,100 that twelvemonth. The ACA established coverage for a portion of the costs for drug spending in this range.[iii]

    Payment models

    The ACA outlined a pilot plan to test the upshot of arranged payments for Medicare. A bundled payment is the commitment of one single payment to providers for the unabridged range of services used to treat a condition. Past contrast, under traditional fee-for-service reimbursement, doctors are paid separately for each service provided. For the Medicare program, the law allowed providers to voluntarily group together to enter into the payment arrangement with Medicares.[26] [49] [fifty]

    Primary care Scrabble letters.jpg

    The ACA also included a shift from volume-based purchasing—paying for the number of services provided—to value-based purchasing—paying for the quality of services provided. Since 2012, hospitals accept received a one percent reduction in Medicare payments to fund a reward program providing bonuses to hospitals that meet standards of high quality, efficient care.[26] [51]

    Additionally, the police force included iv provisions related to master care:[26] [52]

    • Extra funding for the National Health Service Corps, which provides scholarships and loan repayment for primary care providers serving in high-demand communities
    • Actress funding for programs that train master care providers
    • A 10 per centum increase in Medicare payments to primary care providers through 2015
    • An increment in Medicaid payments to primary care providers to Medicare levels through 2014

    Accountable care organizations

    The Affordable Care Human action included provisions outlining a system of accountable care organizations (ACOs) as a model for Medicare providers. An accountable care organization (ACO) is a group of doctors, hospitals, or other healthcare providers that work together with the stated purpose of delivering loftier-quality intendance at a lower cost. The germination of ACOs was fabricated voluntary for providers. Under the model outlined past the ACA, if an ACO generated savings on the cost of intendance for a Medicare patient, the federal regime would give the providers a portion of the savings. If not, the group would have to have a loss on the price of care provided. ACOs could be formed by physicians, hospitals or—in the private marketplace—insurers. Although the ACO provision of the Affordable Care Act pertained specifically to Medicare, some providers formed ACOs for patients with private insurance besides, and 16 state Medicaid programs contract with ACOs. According to the periodical Health Affairs, as of September 2015, the majority of the 23.five million individuals served by ACOs were enrolled in private insurance or Medicaid. Medicare patients accounted for seven.8 million of the individuals in ACOs.[26] [53] [54]

    Taxes and fees

    The post-obit is a list of taxes and fees included in the Affordable Intendance Act as written. This list may not be exhaustive and changes to the tax lawmaking in subsequent years may take impacted some of these provisions.[55]

    • boosted 0.9 per centum Medicare taxation on high-income earners
    • 3.8 percent tax on investment income above a certain threshold
    • 40 per centum excise taxation on loftier-cost health plans (known as the Cadillac tax)
    • 10 percent excise tax on indoor tanning services
    • annual fee for manufacturers of make name pharmaceuticals
    • annual fee for wellness insurers
    • 2.three percent excise tax on medical devices

    Attempts to change or repeal

    September fourteen, 2017: Commenting on the apparent change of position among Republican senators who voted confronting Obamacare repeal, Senator Ben Sasse (R-Nib.) claimed, "With just one exception, every member of the Republican majority already either voted for repeal or explicitly campaigned on repeal."
    Is Sasse right?

    Read Ballotpedia'due south fact check »

    The Affordable Care Act was subject to a number of lawsuits challenging some of its provisions, such every bit the private mandate and the requirement to cover contraception. Four of these lawsuits were heard by the United states Supreme Court, resulting in changes to the law and how information technology was enforced. In add-on, since the law'southward enactment, lawmakers in Congress have introduced and considered legislation to change or repeal parts or all of the Affordable Care Deed. Finally, between 2010 and 2012, voters in eight states considered ballot measures related to the police. This section summarizes the lawsuits, legislation, and state ballot measures that attempted to change, repeal, or impact enforcement of parts of the law.

    Lawsuits

    See too: Obamacare lawsuits

    Zubik 5. Burwell

    Pursuant to the U.South. Supreme Court's 2014 decision in Burwell 5. Hobby Lobby, religious organizations and closely-held for-profit companies became eligible for an exemption from the Affordable Care Human activity'due south contraception mandate. Under the exemption, organizations could notify the government of their religious objections to contraception, which would so make an arrangement with the insurance company to provide contraceptive coverage to the employees. However, 43 different Cosmic organizations filed 12 lawsuits challenging this accommodation, arguing that they would however be complicit in providing contraception to their employees. Read more than.

    Male monarch five. Burwell

    The Affordable Intendance Act states an private is eligible for a tax credit if he or she enrolls in an insurance plan through "an Exchange established by the State." Consequently, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a dominion allowing tax credits for insurance plans purchased in both state and federal exchanges. At issue in Rex five. Burwell was whether the ACA permitted the IRS to interpret the law in this mode and grant tax credits to individuals who purchased their health insurance from the federal wellness insurance commutation in addition to the land exchanges. If tax subsidies were not bachelor for insurance plans purchased through federal commutation, an estimated 6.4 million Americans would have been impacted, and the three interconnected reforms of Obamacare would have been undermined. Read more .

    National Federation of Contained Business v. Sebelius

    This federal lawsuit was filed in Florida, with 26 states, two individuals, and an independent organization named every bit plaintiffs. The lawsuit challenged the Affordable Care Act on the grounds that the private health insurance mandate exceeded Congress' dominance to regulate interstate commerce nether the Commerce Clause of Article I and did non fall within its power to tax. The complaint farther declared that the Act violated the Tenth Amendment by compelling states to follow federal regulations—nether the ACA, states would have lost federal Medicaid funding had they not expanded their Medicaid programs. Read more .

    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby

    The Affordable Care Act had mandated that insurance plans must comprehend certain essential benefits—which HHS later interpreted to include contraceptive coverage. Employers that didn't provide this do good in their health insurance plan would confront hefty fines. Two family unit-owned companies—Hobby Entrance hall and Conestoga Wood Specialty—challenged the contraception mandate in court. They sought exemptions from coverage of four different contraceptives—ii emergency morning afterward pills and two intrauterine devices (IUDs)—on the basis that those contraceptives were forms of abortion according to their religious beliefs. Read more .

    U.S. House of Representatives v. Burwell

    On July 30, 2014, the House voted 225 to 201 in favor of a resolution to file a lawsuit confronting the Obama assistants. The lawsuit challenged the administration's delay of the ACA's employer mandate and its payment of subsidies to insurers for providing a reduced cost burden to low-income consumers under the law. Boehner claimed the executive branch "changed the healthcare law without a vote of Congress" by delaying the employer mandate and violated Commodity I of the Constitution by using unappropriated funds to make payments to insurers. Read more .

    Legislation

    See too: Alternative proposals to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and Republican effort to repeal the ACA, July 2017

    According to the Congressional Research Service, upwardly through December 2015, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to alter, defund, delay, or repeal portions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in some mode 56 times earlier. Sixteen of these measures were ultimately enacted and signed into police by old President Barack Obama (D); these bills fabricated bipartisan changes such as delaying the forty percent excise tax on high-price health plans and amending definitions.[56]

    Four of the bills that passed the House would accept repealed the constabulary in its entirety had they been enacted; merely i fabricated it to President Obama'due south desk, 60 minutes 3762. The passage of Hour 3762, the Restoring Americans' Healthcare Liberty Act, marked the starting time fourth dimension a measure out to repeal major portions of the constabulary had passed both the House and the U.S. Senate. President Obama vetoed the bill.[56] [57]

    In 2017, following the election of President Donald Trump (R), Congress voted on 2 bills to modify the ACA, the American Health Care Human action (AHCA) in the Firm and the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA) in the Senate. Both bills were reconciliation bills that proposed modifying the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the ACA. The Firm passed the AHCA 217-213 on May 4, 2017. During the week of July 23, 2017, the Senate held a series of votes on the BCRA. Ultimately, the Senate did not laissez passer the bill.

    American Health Care Human activity of 2017

    Run into also: American Health Care Act of 2017

    On March 6, 2017, House Republicans introduced the American Health Care Act of 2017 (AHCA), a reconciliation bill that proposed modifying the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the ACA. Trump offered his full back up for the legislation.[58] [59]

    The bill was a reconciliation bill, meaning information technology would accept impacted the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the ACA, and did non comprise a provision to repeal the police force in its entirety. It proposed repealing the revenue enhancement penalties on individuals for non maintaining health coverage and on employers for not offering coverage. The ACA'due south income-based tax credits for purchasing insurance would have ended, equally would have the enhanced federal funding for states that expanded Medicaid. The bill contained its ain system of tax credits, based on age rather than income, and a punishment in the course of increased premiums for individuals who did not maintain continuous coverage.[58]

    After ii canceled votes in March, the House reintroduced the measure on April 6, 2017. On April thirteen, Firm Republicans added a new amendment to the American Health Care Act in an attempt to unite the party behind the neb, allowing states to opt out of some of the beak's provisions. Some other subpoena was added on May three, 2017, to provide states with an additional $8 billion over five years to fund loftier-gamble pools. These two amendments garnered enough votes from moderate and conservative Republicans to pass the pecker on May 4, 2017, by a vote of 217-213.[60] [61] [62]

    Better Care Reconciliation Human action of 2017

    See too: Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017

    On June 22, 2017, the U.Southward. Senate released the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017 (BCRA), its version of the House bill, the American Health Care Deed (AHCA). The neb was a reconciliation neb that proposed modifying the monetary and financial provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), besides known as Obamacare. On July xiii, 2017, the Senate released a revised version of the nib that included changes, such equally $45 billion to address the opioid epidemic and allowing the sale of health plans that practise non comply with ACA standards. For detailed information on the BCRA, click here.

    On July 17, 2017, later weeks of negotiating the bill, Senate Bulk Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said that his party was unable to concord on a replacement bill for the ACA, but the pecker was revived two days after. During the terminal calendar week of July, the Senate voted on iii major proposals to repeal and replace the ACA. A procedural vote on the BCRA was rejected by a vote of 43-57. A proposal to repeal the ACA and filibuster the effective date for two years to provide time for a replacement bill failed past a vote of 45-55. The terminal major subpoena—the "skinny bill"—was rejected by a 49-51 vote. It contained the provisions to repeal the requirements for individuals to enroll in wellness insurance and for employers to offer it, among other provisions.[63] [64] [65] [66] [67]

    Later on the skinny beak failed, McConnell said, "it is time to move on," and he called the final defeat disappointing.[68]

    Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Act of 2015

    Come across also: Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act of 2015

    On January 6, 2016, the U.S. Business firm of Representatives voted in favor of a pecker to repeal parts of the Affordable Care Human activity, also known every bit "Obamacare," and to end federal funding for Planned Parenthood over the next twelvemonth. President Barack Obama vetoed the measure on January 8, stating that the legislation would accept caused harm "to the health and fiscal security of millions of Americans."[57]

    The bill, HR 3762, was widely expected to be vetoed by the president and, co-ordinate to The Hill, was viewed as more than of a symbolic move for the Republican Party to show voters "how they would govern if they win back the White Firm in November." The measure had been passed before in the Senate as a reconciliation bill, which bypasses filibuster attempts and needs merely 51 votes to laissez passer, rather than the standard 60 votes. The pecker would take ended the expansion of Medicaid and federal subsidies for people buying health insurance on the new exchanges. These changes would have taken place in 2018, and Republicans say they would have used the two years in between to implement a replacement of the law. The Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the beak would have reduced the federal deficit by $282 billion betwixt 2016 and 2025.[56] [69]

    This map highlights the various states' responses

    Ballot mensurate challenges

    Beginning early on during congressional debate over the Affordable Intendance Act, ten legislative referrals and citizen initiatives appeared seeking to terminate implementation of the act in 8 states. Virtually of these ballot measures proposed an amendment to the state'southward constitution declaring that citizens of the respective land could not be compelled to purchase health insurance or exist fined for non doing and then. Some measures, however, instead chose to focus on prohibiting the state'southward government from establishing a health insurance exchange. This item tactic was used so as to gain additional legal leverage before the courts by making available the statement that the federal law violated country constitutions. Another aspect of this strategy was to demonstrate public disapproval of the bill by having such constitutional changes be decided by voters rather than state legislators. This effort was not universally successful, however, because voters in some states refused to corroborate these constitutional amendments.

    The following is a list of states that saw such constitutional amendments on their ballots since 2008. Successful measures are indicated with a Approved a.

    • Arizona Health Insurance Reform Amendment, Proposition 106 (2010)Approved a
    • Missouri Health Care Freedom, Proposition C (August 2010)Approved a
    • Oklahoma Health Intendance Freedom Amendment, State Question 756 (2010)Approved a
    • Alabama Wellness Care Amendment, Amendment 6 (2012)Approved a
    • Montana Wellness Intendance Measure, LR-122 (2012)Approved a
    • Wyoming Health Care Amendment, Constitutional Subpoena A (2012)Approved a
    • Missouri Health Care Exchange Question, Proposition Eastward (2012)Approved a
    • Florida Health Intendance, Subpoena 1 (2012)Defeated d
    • Arizona Medical Liberty to Cull, Proposition 101 (2008)Defeated d
    • Colorado Health Care, Subpoena 63 (2010)Defeated d

    Recent news

    The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Affordable Care Act. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

    Run across also

    Footnotes

    1. ↑ New York Times, "Obama Signs Wellness Intendance Overhaul Bill, With a Flourish," March 23, 2010
    2. ↑ National Academy for State Health Policy, "Where States Stand on Medicaid Expansion," November 7, 2018
    3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.two 3.three iii.four iii.5 3.half dozen The Staff of The Washington Post. (2010). Landmark: The Inside Story of America'southward New Health-Care Law and What It Means for United states All. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
    4. ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.3590 - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," accessed Baronial 28, 2017
    5. ↑ GovTrack, "H.R. 3590 (111th): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," March 21, 2010
    6. ↑ Kaiser Family Foundation, "Wellness Reform Implementation Timeline," accessed March 12, 2014
    7. ↑ Notation: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Whatever inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    8. ↑ HealthCare.gov, "Affordable Care Act (ACA)," accessed August 17, 2017
    9. ↑ HealthCare.gov, "If you don't take health insurance: How much you'll pay," accessed Baronial 21, 2017
    10. ↑ HealthCare.gov, "Hardship exemptions, forms & how to apply," accessed August 21, 2017
    11. ↑ Henry J. Kaiser Family unit Foundation, "Employer Responsibility Under the Affordable Care Act," September 30, 2016
    12. ↑ Internal Revenue Service, "Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions," accessed August 28, 2017
    13. ↑ 13.0 13.i National Briefing of State Legislatures, "State Actions to Address Health Insurance Exchanges," October 13, 2015
    14. ↑ Healthcare.gov, "Health Insurance Marketplace," accessed November sixteen, 2015
    15. ↑ The Staff of The Washington Post. (2010). Landmark: The Inside Story of America'southward New Health-Care Law and What Information technology Means for Us All. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
    16. ↑ The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Total Health Insurance Exchange Grants," accessed October xx, 2015
    17. ↑ Healthcare.gov, "Wellness Programme Categories," accessed Nov 16, 2015
    18. ↑ Healthcare.gov, "Advanced Premium Tax Credits (APTC)," accessed Oct xix, 2015
    19. ↑ nineteen.0 19.i Internal Revenue Service, "Questions and Answers on the Premium Tax Credit," accessed October 19, 2015
    20. ↑ The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Cost-Sharing Subsidies in Federal Market place Plans," February 11, 2015
    21. ↑ Healthcare.gov, "Cost Sharing Reduction," accessed Oct 19, 2015
    22. ↑ Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Man Services, "Computations for the 2016 Poverty Guidelines," accessed August 21, 2017
    23. ↑ Healthcare.gov, "Federal Poverty Level (FPL)," accessed October xix, 2015
    24. ↑ The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "The Coverage Gap: Uninsured Poor Adults in States that Do Non Aggrandize Medicaid – An Update," October 23, 2015
    25. ↑ 25.0 25.i HealthInsurance.org, "CO-OP health plans: patients' interests first," accessed August 23, 2017
    26. ↑ 26.0 26.one 26.ii 26.3 26.4 26.five 26.six Pol, "Understanding Obamacare: Politico'southward Guide to the Affordable Intendance Act," accessed October 21, 2015
    27. ↑ 27.0 27.ane HealthCare.gov, "What Marketplace health insurance plans embrace," accessed August 22, 2017
    28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Forbes, "Essential Health Benefits Under The Affordable Care Deed," October 11, 2013
    29. ↑ Robert Woods Johnson Foundation, "Essential Health Benefits," May 2, 2013
    30. ↑ United State Government Press Function, "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Health Insurance Market place Rules; Rate Review," February 27, 2013
    31. ↑ U.s.a. Department of Health and Human Services, "Lifetime & Annual Limits," accessed October 21, 2015
    32. ↑ Legal Information Constitute, "45 CFR 156.270 - Termination of coverage for qualified individuals," accessed October 22, 2015
    33. ↑ The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Health Insurance Market Reforms: Charge per unit Review," December 2012
    34. ↑ 34.0 34.one Congressional Research Service, "Medical Loss Ratio Requirements Nether the Affordable Care Human activity," Baronial 26, 2014
    35. ↑ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "Medical Loss Ratio," accessed Oct 13, 2015
    36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 The Henry J. Kaiser Family unit Foundation, "Explaining Health Care Reform: Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)," February 29, 2012
    37. ↑ The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Explaining Health Care Reform: Risk Adjustment, Reinsurance, and Hazard Corridors," August 17, 2016
    38. ↑ Pol, "Court: Federal authorities doesn't owe insurers Obamacare payments," June 14, 2018
    39. ↑ Tate, N. (2012) Obamacare Survival Guide. Humanix Books: Boca Raton, FL.
    40. ↑ Oyez, "National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius," accessed May 20, 2016
    41. ↑ The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Medicaid Financing: How Does it Piece of work and What are the Implications?" May xx, 2015
    42. ↑ Kaiser Family unit Foundation, "The Coverage Gap: Uninsured Poor Adults in States That Exercise Not Expand Medicaid Coverage," Apr 17, 2015
    43. ↑ HealthInsurance.org, "Medicaid," accessed January 10, 2020
    44. ↑ Tate, N. (2012) Obamacare Survival Guide. Humanix Books: Boca Raton, FL.
    45. ↑ 45.0 45.i Kaiser Family Foundation, "Medicare Spending and Financing: A Primer," February 2011
    46. ↑ Congressional Inquiry Service, "The Independent Payment Informational Board," Apr 17, 2013
    47. ↑ Wall Street Journal, "Why I Support the Ryan Roadmap," December 10, 2010
    48. ↑ Health Affairs Weblog, "ACA Circular-Up: Medicare Trustees Written report Does Not Trigger IPAB, And More," July 14, 2017
    49. ↑ Health Affairs, "The Payment Reform Landscape: Bundled Payment," July two, 2014
    50. ↑ Harvard Business Review, "Getting Bundled Payments Right in Wellness Intendance," October 19, 2015
    51. ↑ Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, "How Does Medicare Value-Based Purchasing Work?" June 2012
    52. ↑ U.s.a. Department of Health and Human being Services, "Creating Health Intendance Jobs by Addressing Primary Care Workforce Needs," accessed October 22, 2015
    53. ↑ Kaiser Health News, "Accountable Intendance Organizations, Explained," September 14, 2015
    54. ↑ Health Affairs Blog, "Growth And Dispersion Of Accountable Care Organizations In 2015," March 31, 2015
    55. ↑ Internal Revenue Service, "Affordable Care Act Tax Provisions," accessed August 23, 2017
    56. ↑ 56.0 56.1 56.2 Congressional Research Service, "Legislative Actions to Repeal, Defund, or Delay the Affordable Intendance Act," December 9, 2015
    57. ↑ 57.0 57.one CNN, "Obama vetoes Obamacare repeal bill," January 8, 2016
    58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 House Energy and Commerce Committee, "Upkeep Reconciliation Legislative Recommendations Relating to Repeal and Replace of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," accessed March 7, 2017
    59. ↑ Breitbart, "Donald Trump: 'I'yard 100 Percent Behind' Obamacare Replacement Program," accessed March 22, 2017
    60. ↑ Reuters, "U.South. House passes healthcare nib in large win for Trump," May four, 2017
    61. ↑ CNBC, "Republicans have a new plan to repeal Obamacare — and here it is," April 20, 2017
    62. ↑ The New York Times, "$eight Billion Bargain Gives Crucial Momentum to G.O.P. Health Bill," May 3, 2017
    63. ↑ The Colina, "Senate GOP revives negotiation over ObamaCare repeal and replace," July 19, 2017
    64. ↑ Senate.gov, "On the Motion (Motility to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Subject Re: Amdt. No. 270)," July 25, 2017
    65. ↑ Senate.gov, "On the Subpoena (Paul Amdt. No. 271 )," July 26, 2017
    66. ↑ Senate.gov, "On the Amendment (McConnell Amdt. No. 667 )," July 28, 2017
    67. ↑ Axios, "Hither'due south the Senate's "skinny" wellness care neb," July 27, 2017
    68. ↑ The Colina, "McConnell: 'Time to move on' after healthcare defeat," July 28, 2017
    69. ↑ The Hill, "House passes ObamaCare repeal, sending measure to president," January 6, 2016

    v•e

    Ballotpedia
    About

    Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

    Executive: Leslie Graves, President • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy

    Communications: Kayla Harris • Megan Brown • Sarah Groat • Lauren Nemerovski
    External Relations: Alison Prange • Sara Key • Kari Berger • Hannah Nelson
    Operations: Meghann Olshefski • Lauren Dixon • Kelly Rindfleisch
    Policy: Christopher Nelson • Caitlin Styrsky • Molly Byrne • Katharine Frey • Jimmy McAllister
    Tech: Matt Latourelle, Tech Manager • Ryan Burch • Michael Cella • Kirsten Corrao • Margaret Kearney

    Contributors: Scott Rasmussen
    Editorial

    Geoff Pallay, Editor-in-Chief • Daniel Anderson, Managing Editor • Josh Altic, Managing Editor • Cory Eucalitto, Managing Editor • Mandy Gillip, Managing Editor • Jerrick Adams • Victoria Antram • Dave Beaudoin • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Ryan Byrne • Kate Carsella • Kelly Coyle • Megan Feeney • Juan García de Paredes • Sara Horton • Tyler King • Doug Kronaizl • Amee LaTour • David Luchs • Brittony Maag • Andrew McNair • Jackie Mitchell • Elisabeth Moore • Ellen Morrissey • Mackenzie Tater • Samantha Post • Paul Rader • Ethan Rice • Myj Saintyl • Maddie Sinclair Johnson • Abbey Smith • Janie Valentine • Caitlin Vanden Blast • Joel Williams • Corinne Wolyniec • Samuel Wonacott • Mercedes Yanora

    gardnerconsel.blogspot.com

    Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Obamacare_overview

    0 Response to "Did Democrats Read the Affordable Care Act"

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

    Iklan Atas Artikel

    Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

    Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

    Iklan Bawah Artikel